Let’s Get Physical

In the wake of Wired’s stunning exploration of how the Internet is really grounded in the physical realm, TEDIndia’s Pranav Mistry demoed his SixthSense device, which allows the physical and data worlds to interact with each other.

Watch the actual demo of SixthSense at around the 6 minute mark in the video – you can use any surface as your interface, and even do the snapshot gesture outside and actually take a picture.  Check out the video, seriously no words can do justice to how FREAKING COOL this is.

I love the gestures in Apple’s iPhone, iPod Touch, and MacBook trackpads – because they’re intuitive, not just pre-set shortcuts.  And that’s the key that Mistry and Jobs both see – the future of computing is that intuitiveness: making things easy to use without sacrificing power.

Mistry makes another excellent point: most people aren’t interested in computing, but in information. Even most geeks ironically love our gadgets more when we barely notice them at all.

via Om Malik

Everything Bad is Good for You

Ok, technically no one is decrying the brain-rotting effects of search engines (except those weird Bing “Search Overload Syndrome” commercials).  But in the vein of Steven Berlin Johnson’s excellent book about how supposed “sensory overload” is actually making us smarter, Science Daily reports that “search engine use is not just part of our daily routines; it is also becoming part of our learning process.”

The study observed that searchers use the engines to confirm their own knowledge, not just to find unknown answers – enriching the learning process. Also, subjects actually used search engines differently according to their learning styles.

My general philosophy about all kinds of media, including interactive media like search engines, is that they are all just tools, and our benefit and detriment stem from our use of them, and not inherent value. So this study is encouraging but not particularly surprising, I think.

I look forward to how scientists and educational researchers will use search engines and similar programs to further interactive and learning, especially in elementary school. Nothing spurs a kid’s imagination more than the discovery of possibility.

(via BoingBoing)

A World Without Jobs

No, no, not the literal jobs like the up-to-17% unemployment rate. I mean the Savior-of-Apple Jobs, el Steve-O, The Turtlenecked One, Mr. One-More-Thing. What would our world be like if (gasp) he had never gone back to Apple at all?

Mike Arrington posits that very question today, and while he mostly comes up with “no iPhone, and no Android,” I think the answer is actually more profound than that.  Jobs is responsible for HP’s “The Computer is Personal Again” campaign, for taking mp3 players from the realm of “cute little gadgets that techies and some runners used” to ubiquitous device that no self-respecting person between ages 12 and 40 would be without.

Mostly, Jobs is responsible for returning Apple to mass-market products still driven by exceedingly high quality standards.  He riskily bucked the uber-customization trend: he had better taste than you, and there wre limited options (candy-colored iMacs notwithstanding).  He was a dictator, yes, but a benevolent one.

Jobs’ hyper-controlled and often-criticized ad campaigns transformed marketing strategies not only for the computer and technology industries but across advertising clients.  Everything he touched seemed to turn into a cultural touchstone, without most of the population knowing exactly why they knew what an iMac or an iPod was (remember how revolutionary the original candy bubbles and white bricks were?).

I am, admittedly, an Apple fangirl, but I’m not blind to the many many shortcomings the company has had in product development and brand management over the years.  And Jobs is hardly the Golden Messiah he is frequently (even in this post) trumped up to be – how much more profitable could iMacs have been if Jobs had never insisted on the hockeypuck mouse?

But missteps and egotrips aside, it’s hard to argue that the man has a certain Midas touch.  More importantly, he proved that consumer-driven can also be performance-driven, and beauty-driven, and simplicity-driven, and – the king of them all – highly lucrative.

*This post does not endorse unauthorized file sharing

Engadget’s got an always useful post about getting content off an iPod or iPhone.  For Macs, the main tool is Pod to Mac, while PCs should use SharePod.  There are also instructions for manual copying, but most people will probably want to stick to the software solutions.

Thanks, Ross!

Who is the target demo?

Personally, I greeted the MacBook Air’s debut with mixed emotions.  On the one hand, I had been one of those die-hard 12-inch PowerBook users who kept that adorably portable pro notebook running long after I should have switched to an Intel model.  When I finally caved and got an MacBook, I lamented that a single extra inch of screen made the whole thing much more unwieldy.

So I was glad to see Apple hadn’t abandoned those of us who didn’t want mega-screens on an ostensibly portable device, but I was disappointed that the Air’s big draw was thinness, not overall size.  It was still wider and taller than the 12″ PowerBook, but it sacrificed the 12-incher’s disk drive and (relative) affordability for a solid state hard drive with questionable advantages.

In other words, the Air was a vanity device, not a desktop replacement, or even an Apple netbook.  I wasn’t giving up my MacBook just yet.

The rumored Apple tablet, supposedly coming out next year (possibly at MacWorld or WWDC?) has some similar issues.  Described/fantasized as an iPod Touch on steroids, it would have none of the functionality/desktop-replacement-ness of a notebook with none of the portability of an iPod Touch.

So what is the appeal again?  It looks super sexy?  Yeah, that worked out well for the Prada phone.  Apple already knows that usability trumps specs: that’s why the first iPhone was such a hit despite lack of 3G, MMS, true GPS, and a whole host of other features that were already standard on other PDAs.  Not to mention the triumph of Wii over PS3.

The New York Times explores five reasons why tablets haven’t been successful.

“One more thing…” – Jobs phasing self out?

Many have noticed that Steve Jobs looked less than stellar at Tuesday’s press conference, and that he delegated many of the announcements to other Apple gurus.  It looks like SuperSteve is phasing himself out of the limelight, which could be important for Apple’s stability (and that of it stock price) when the inevitable happens and the company has to continue without the Oracle of Jobs.

We all know what happened when Steve left the first time, but that was abrupt and less than prudent.  Now, with a long-term gameplan in place, Apple stands a good chance of continuing Jobs legacy of inspiration and perfectionism (because we all know his talent lies there, and not in engineering or development).  I’m pleasantly surprised that Jobs himself seems to have recognized the importance of a smooth and gradual transition.

Here’s to a much-deserved and bittersweet retirement.

Free Metro WiFi? Not so much…

Computerworld’s Craig Mathias wrote a nice opinion piece criticizing the idea of free citywide WiFi access.

But mostly I objected to government getting involved in what should be the province of the private sector and the (admittedly flawed) competitive free market. Sure, it’s enticing to think that a wireless telecommunications service, and broadband at that, could be made available for free. But since base stations and network management systems and such are clearly not free, what we’re really talking about here is whether one group of residents (and usually visitors) should be forced to pay more in taxes or fees so that others can pay less or, if the system is truly free, nothing.

He also points out that no one expects other telecommunications services, like phone service, for free, so expecting WiFi to be free gets in the way of systems that should be universal but paid.

My own take is that there already are soooo many problems with how the FCC and other government agencies regulate regular broadcast airwaves. I see no problem, and in fact encourage, private businesses to offer a uniform and wide-reaching system of paid-for wireless Internet access that goes beyond the craptacular “hotspots” offered by the likes of T-Mobile et al.

The municipalities would be involved just like they’re already involved in broadcast media, but no more. They’re not service providers, and would make poor ones if forced into the role.

UI Trumps Hardware

Why Is iPhone Better? Here’s My Story…
The point of the story is that despite being somewhat deficient in terms of hardware relative to some enterprise phones, this thing is designed to make my life easier. I have owned many smart phones, most of which ran Windows Mobile in one way, shape or form. I even had a “local restaurants” application specifically for my last smart phone that I used a few times. I was NEVER able to accomplish ANYTHING in 90 seconds. So, at this point I don’t care that EDGE is slow – I was able to do what I needed to do on the EDGE network in 90 seconds while waiting for a train to pass – I wasn’t able to do that with the fastest EVDO tetherable enterprise-class Smart Phone on the market.

Web 2.0 as Enterprise

Ok ok, I know I’ve been a little MIA recently, but what with the expanded business and new site and traveling, the blog has unfortunately suffered (along with my gym discipline, but that’s another story).

Anyway, Ajit Jaokar at Open Gardens has a great two-part article called Enterprise 2.0 ROI (part 1, part 2).

Basing his articles on Tim O’Reilley and McKinsey’s recent comments about Enterprise being the future of Web 2.0, Jaokar looks at what he calls the “ROI of Enterprise 2.0″ – the real payoffs and efficiencies of the Internet as a platform for enterprise.

The first part talks about the basic principles behind the idea, and quotes Dion Hinchcliffe’s summary of Office 2.0 vs Enterprise 2.0:
Office 2.0 represents the increasing use of browser-based software in the office, while Enterprise 2.0 is more Web 2.0-ish in that it specifically describes the use of freeform, emergent, social software to conduct collaboration and share knowledge.

The second part emphasizes the importance of the person/blogger over the technology/tool. Enterprise 2.0, he argues, is all about relationships rather than technologies like wikis.

He points to people like Robert Scoble as examples of the “rise of the corporate individual” and the “corporate fan base.”

Of course I agree that the human face is paramount, and I am definitely for the emphasis on relationships. But it shouldn’t be overlooked that tools like wikis and other web 2.0 technologies can facilitate the human relationships by encouraging and easing the conversation between the corporate individual and the corporate fan base.

Scoble’s Blog Business Conference next month will focus on this symbiotic relationship. I’ll be going; who else will be there?

Thoughts on this issue, or what you’re expecting at the conference?

Finally, a club I can join!

The Order of the Science Scouts of Exemplary Repute and Above-Average Physique has a bunch of new badges. As such, I award myself the following, with badge descriptions followed by my reasons:

The “talking science” badge: Required for all members. Assumes the recipient conducts himself/herself in such a manner as to talk science whenever he/she gets the chance. Not easily fazed by looks of disinterest from friends of the act of “zoning out” by well-intentioned loved ones. — Duh, if I was capable of not talking about geeky science stuff, or of shutting up when everyone’s eyes are rolling out of their heads, I wouldn’t be geektastik, now would I?

The “I blog about science” badge: In which the recipient maintains a blog where at least a quarter of the material is about science. — Self-explanatory, no?

The “I may look like a scientist but I’m actually also a ninja” badge: Lethal when in combination with the “destroyer of quackery” badge. — Fact: The purpose of the ninja is to flip out and kill people.

The “world’s foremost expert on an obscure subject” badge: In which the recipient is the leading expert in a field that few others share an interest in. — Okay, so it’s not scientific field, and I’m not a leader in it, but I did major in Comparative Literature, specializing in the literature of former French, Spanish, and British colonies in the Caribbean, all in original languages.

The “non-explainer” badge (LEVEL I): Where the recipient can no longer explain what they do to their parents. — I’m a “Technology & Communications Consultant.” Yeah.

Dave Ng is Director of the Advanced Molecular Biology Lab, the educational arm of University of British Columbia’s Michael Smith labs. He also edits the Science Creative Quarterly, the flagship publication of the O.O.T.S.S.O.E.R.A.A.A.P. (or simply, “the Science Scouts”).

UPDATE: I have been trying to format pictures of the actual badges, but my blog editor is being annoying. Anyway…